Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a somewhat heavier but incredibly thinner device than the Motorola One Zoom. The Motorola One Zoom features a really superior processing power than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a brighter screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite lower pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 and a larger screen. Motorola One Zoom counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a back camera with a lot lower 48 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better images in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Zoom, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.