Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a score of 80 against 79. The Motorola One Zoom body is newer and much thinner, but heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a much better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola One Zoom has a slightly better memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 39% bigger battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.