Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 545.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 3840 pixels (4K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 10.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 630 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than Xperia Z5 Premium, getting an 80 score against 79.8. The Motorola One Zoom construction is noticeably newer than the Xperia Z5 Premium's, although it's thicker and just a little heavier. The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.
Xperia Z5 Premium counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia Z5 Premium also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit better camera than Xperia Z5 Premium, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola One Zoom has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 128 GB against 200 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Zoom has a little longer battery life than Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola One Zoom is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.