Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom, having a score of 80.2 against 80. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro construction is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Motorola One Zoom, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a slightly better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit lower display pixels density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola One Zoom features a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, they both have a 48 megapixels back-facing camera, the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a battery duration that is just as good as Motorola One Zoom's battery performance.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is more expensive than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Zoom, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.