Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than the Motorola One, with a global score of 82.5 against 74.3. Google Pixel 2 XL's construction has the same thickness than Motorola One, but it is just a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a sharper screen than Motorola One, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little bigger screen and a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit superior processor than Motorola One. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 2 XL captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola One features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with improved battery life than Motorola One, because it has a 17 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.