Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than Motorola One, having a global score of 82.5 against 74.3. Even though LG V30S ThinQ and the Motorola One were released with only 8 months difference, LG V30S ThinQ is a little thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has the previous 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better screen than Motorola One, because it has a lot greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a quite bigger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola One, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger aperture for better low light photos and a more megapixels back-facing camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola One, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola One, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.