Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola One's 74.3 score. The LG V35 ThinQ is a a little bit thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than Motorola One, even when they were only released with a few months difference. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola One, because it has a way greater pixel number per inch of display, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a more mega-pixels back camera.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.