Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than Motorola One, with a score of 87.1 against 74.3. LG Velvet is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Motorola One, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. LG Velvet has just a little better performance than Motorola One, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has a more vivid screen than Motorola One, because it has a higher display pixels density, a larger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. The LG Velvet features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola One, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a camera with way more megapixels and a larger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments. The LG Velvet counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola One, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.