Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is slightly better than Motorola One, having a 76.4 score against 74.3. The Nokia 9 PureView construction has the same thickness than the Motorola One, but it's just a little heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a much more vibrant display than Motorola One, because it has a way higher display pixel density, a quite bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Nokia 9 PureView shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola One, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Motorola One features a slightly better memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Nokia 9 PureView has a little better battery life than Motorola One, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola One, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.