Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than Motorola One, with a general score of 79.4 against 74.3. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A35 5G's body is newer than the Motorola One's, although it's extremely heavier and a bit thicker.
Motorola One has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola One, because it has a little bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a higher display pixel density.
The Motorola One features a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a really longer battery performance than Motorola One, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a camera with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.