Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the Motorola One, getting a general score of 83.8 against 74.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Motorola One were released with only 4 months difference, Samsung Galaxy A50's body is just a little heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola One. The Galaxy A50 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola One, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better screen density and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola One, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola One, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola One, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a way more MP camera in the back and a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.