Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the Motorola One's general score of 74.3. The Galaxy A51 construction has the same thickness than the Motorola One, but it's a little heavier. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A51 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One, because it has a quite bigger display, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A51 features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 has longer battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A51 takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola One, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A51 also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.