Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola One's 74.3 global score. Galaxy A70's design has the same thickness than Motorola One, but it is somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A70 has just a bit better display than Motorola One, because it has a little bit larger display, more pixels per display inch and a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola One, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola One captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Motorola One.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.