Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 285 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola One, getting a overall score of 92.9 against 74.3. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is newer than the Motorola One's, but it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a better screen than Motorola One, because it has a bit larger display, a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better performance than Motorola One, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way better resolution camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than Motorola One, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.