Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 285 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than the Motorola One, with an 88.1 score against 74.3. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy F62 design is a lot newer, but thicker and notably heavier than Motorola One. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit better processor than Motorola One, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM.
Galaxy F62 has a brighter display than Motorola One, because it has a little bit larger display, a higher pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a greater camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments and a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy F62 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola One, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.