Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than Motorola One, having a 97.6 score against 74.3. The Galaxy Fold body is newer and thinner than Motorola One's, although it is also way heavier. These phones include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better display than Motorola One, because it has a larger display, a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a better screen pixel density. Galaxy Fold shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lesser megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Galaxy Fold features much more storage for games and applications than Motorola One, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Fold features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.