Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the Motorola One, getting a global score of 81.1 against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Motorola One. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy Note 3 has a way better looking display than Motorola One, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features just a little better processing power than Motorola One, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Motorola One features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 256 GB. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low light situations, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 13 MP resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rate.
The Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more than Motorola One, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.