Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than Motorola One, getting an 81.2 score against 74.3. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is a better device than the Motorola One, we must note that it is also an a lot older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker device.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little better performance than Motorola One, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy Note 3 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola One, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a higher pixel number per inch of display.
Motorola One features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola One also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures clearer photos and videos than Motorola One, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy Note 3 features a little better battery life than Motorola One, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.