Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | -- |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than the Motorola One, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 74.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and much thinner cellphone than the Motorola One.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a way better display than Motorola One, because it has a little bigger display, a greater screen pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Motorola One counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Motorola One counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 counts with improved battery life than Motorola One, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy S25 takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a much higher video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola One, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.