Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is just a bit better than Motorola One, getting a global score of 75.8 against 74.3. Despite being the best device we compare here, the Galaxy S7 Active is an a lot older, way thicker and somewhat heavier device than Motorola One. The Motorola One counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One also has a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a way better looking display than Motorola One, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a much higher display pixel density. The Motorola One counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has longer battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola One has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One also counts with a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.