Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 285 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than Motorola One, having an 80.1 score against 74.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than the Motorola One, it's a lot thicker and much heavier.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much sharper display than Motorola One, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Motorola One features a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a really longer battery duration than Motorola One, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.