Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 285 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Motorola One, with a global score of 81 against 74.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer than Motorola One's, although it's heavier and incredibly thicker.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a more vivid display than Motorola One, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bit larger screen and a better pixel count per inch in the screen. Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Motorola One, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is more expensive than the Motorola One, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.