Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola One's global score of 74.3. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is newer and a bit thinner than Motorola One's, although it is also somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processing unit than Motorola One, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a better screen than Motorola One, because it has a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One, because although it has a less MP back camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.