Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than the Motorola One, with a 92.3 score against 74.3. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than Motorola One, although it's somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a sharper display than Motorola One, because it has a higher pixels number in each inch of display, a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola One, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola One, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola One, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.