Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Motorola One, with a 94.6 score against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Motorola One, although it is notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better performance than Motorola One, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One, because it has a bigger display, more pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better camera than Motorola One, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.