Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.90 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 100 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 135 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.32 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 1661 is better than Motorola P280, with a score of 27.3 against 24.1. The Nokia 1661 design is notably lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola P280. The Nokia 1661 has a CPU that is very similar to the Motorola P280 one, both have a 0-Core processing unit. Nokia 1661 has an incredibly better display than Motorola P280, because it has a better 160 x 128 resolution.
Nokia 1661's camera is just as good as the Motorola P280 one. Motorola P280 and Nokia 1661 count with similar memory capacity for applications and games. The Nokia 1661 has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola P280.
The Nokia 1661 costs the same than Motorola P280.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.