Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-06-09 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.00 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is way better than Motorola PHOTON 4G's 57.5 general score. The Google Pixel 3 XL body is much newer and noticeably thinner than the Motorola PHOTON 4G's, although it is heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better performing processor than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a brighter screen than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has a lot better pixels count per inch in the display, a really larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has a 102% more battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better camera than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.