Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-06-09 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.00 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 199 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a lot better than Motorola PHOTON 4G's 57.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a much newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Motorola PHOTON 4G, although it is also a little heavier. The Galaxy A50 has a more vivid screen than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has a much higher screen pixels density, a really bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has 112 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has more cpu cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A50 features a much longer battery life than Motorola PHOTON 4G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes much better videos and photos than Motorola PHOTON 4G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A50 costs a little more than Motorola PHOTON 4G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.