Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.235.4
Basic Information
MotorolaLG
Windows Mobile Standard 5.0--
2005-07-262008-02-11
4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches3.93 x 1.88 x 0.57 inches
4.06 ounces5.46 ounces
$ 330.00$ 150.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.3
processor processor
64 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--51,2 MB internal memory
miniSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
00.4
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
1130mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
212 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.82.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--
Infra-red port--
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The LG KM500 is a bit better than the Motorola Q CDMA, having a global score of 35.4 against 32.2. The LG KM500 body is a lot newer, but a lot thicker and notably heavier than the Motorola Q CDMA. The LG KM500 has a processor that is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Q CDMA, both of them have the same number of cores.

LG KM500 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Q CDMA. Both of them have an equal 320 x 240 resolution. The LG KM500 counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Q CDMA, although it has no SD extension slot. LG KM500 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Q CDMA, because it has a camera with a much higher 2 MP resolution.

Motorola Q CDMA has a much better battery performance than LG KM500, because it has a 1130mAh battery size.

LG KM500 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.