Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.235.4
Basic Information
MotorolaMotorola
Windows Mobile Standard 5.0--
2005-07-262008-09-23
4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches3.86 x 2.14 x 0.94 inches
4.06 ounces4.94 ounces
$ 330.00$ 170.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.1
processor processor
64 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
miniSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
00.6
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMAHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.9
Battery Life
1130mAh Li-Ion Battery1130mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
212 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
337 hours standby time
5.9 hours talk time
2.82.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0
GPSGPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

The Motorola Tundra has an overall score of 35.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Q CDMA's 32.2 global score. Even though Motorola Tundra is noticeably newer than the Motorola Q CDMA, it is somewhat heavier and much thicker. Motorola Tundra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Q CDMA. Both have an equal resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.

The Motorola Tundra counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Q CDMA, although it has no SD memory slot. The Motorola Tundra counts with a CPU that's just as good as Motorola Q CDMA's processor, they have the same number of cores. The Motorola Tundra has a battery duration that's very similar to the Motorola Q CDMA one.

The Motorola Tundra shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Q CDMA, because it has a lot more MP back facing camera.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola Tundra is also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.