Compare phones
Nokia 220
Dual SIM| Global Score | |
| 32.2 | 34.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Standard 5.0 | -- |
| 2005-07-26 | 2014-02-24 |
| 4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches | 4.58 x 1.98 x 0.52 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 2.95 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow |
| $ 330.00 | $ 145.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| -- | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 6 |
| processor | processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| miniSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor |
| -- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 5.72 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1130mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 212 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 696 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 2.8 | 2.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 220 has an overall score of 34.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Q CDMA's global score of 32.2. Although the Nokia 220 is somewhat thicker than the Motorola Q CDMA, it's much lighter and a lot newer. The Nokia 220 features a processing unit that's very similar to the Motorola Q CDMA one, they have 0 CPU cores.
Nokia 220 counts with a lot better screen than Motorola Q CDMA. They have exactly the same 320 x 240px resolution. The Nokia 220 shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola Q CDMA, because it has a way higher resolution camera. Nokia 220 features much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Q CDMA.
Motorola Q CDMA features a little better battery duration than Nokia 220, because it has 1130mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 220 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.