Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 32.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Standard 5.0 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2005-07-26 | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.7 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| miniSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1130mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 212 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 2.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.1, which is way better than the Motorola Q CDMA's general score of 32.2. Although Galaxy Note 3 is way heavier than Motorola Q CDMA, it's noticeably thinner and also much newer. Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 OS, and Motorola Q CDMA works with Windows Mobile Standard 5.0 OS.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better screen than Motorola Q CDMA, because it has a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better performance than Motorola Q CDMA, because it has more RAM, an extra graphics co-processor and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Note 3 captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Q CDMA, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Q CDMA. Galaxy Note 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Q CDMA, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.