Compare phones
Motorola Q GSM
Q8 GSM| Global Score | |
| 31.6 | 34.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Standard 5.0 | -- |
| 2005-07-26 | 2007-05-31 |
| 4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches | 3.79 x 1.83 x 0.64 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 4.33 ounces |
| $ 165.00 | $ 105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 6.4 |
| processor | processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 20,48 MB internal memory |
| miniSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 5.61 |
| EDGE and GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 320 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6500 slide has a general score of 34.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Q GSM's 31.6 overall score. The Nokia 6500 slide construction is newer than Motorola Q GSM's, but it is just a bit heavier and incredibly thicker. The Motorola Q GSM and the Nokia 6500 slide have extremely similar processing units, both have a 0-Core CPU.
Nokia 6500 slide counts with a way better screen than Motorola Q GSM. Both of them have the same resolution of 320 x 240px. The Nokia 6500 slide features a greater camera than Motorola Q GSM, because it has a much better resolution back camera. The Nokia 6500 slide has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Q GSM, although it has no external memory slot.
The Nokia 6500 slide features a very superior battery duration than Motorola Q GSM.
The Nokia 6500 slide is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.