Compare phones
Motorola Q GSM
Q8 GSM| Global Score | |
| 31.6 | 34.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Standard 5.0 | -- |
| 2005-07-26 | 2009-09-14 |
| 4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches | 3.70 x 1.78 x 0.59 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| $ 165.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| miniSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 960mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 6.3 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung SPH-M330 is just a bit better than the Motorola Q GSM, getting a general score of 34.4 against 31.6. Samsung SPH-M330's design is notably newer and incredibly lighter than the Motorola Q GSM's, although it's also extremely thicker. Samsung SPH-M330's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Q GSM, both have a 0-Core processing unit.
The Samsung SPH-M330 has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Q GSM, although it has a way worse resolution of 160 x 128 pixels. Samsung SPH-M330 features as much memory for games and applications as the Motorola Q GSM one, although the Samsung SPH-M330 has no external memory card slot. The Samsung SPH-M330 features a superior battery performance than Motorola Q GSM.
Motorola Q GSM captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has a camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung SPH-M330 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Motorola Q GSM.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.