Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 33 | 36 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | 2007-11-22 |
| 3.70 x 2.24 x 0.70 inches | 3.93 x 1.99 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.81 ounces | 4.23 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 2.2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 128 pixels per inch | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 71,68 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | 320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
LG Shine CU720 is a little bit better than Motorola RAMBLER, with a 36 score against 33. LG Shine CU720 is a thinner but a little heavier phone than the Motorola RAMBLER. Motorola RAMBLER and LG Shine CU720 have very similar processors, they have the same number of cores. LG Shine CU720 features a sharper screen than Motorola RAMBLER, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG Shine CU720 also has a better display pixels density and a better 320 x 240 pixels resolution.
The LG Shine CU720 features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola RAMBLER. LG Shine CU720 features a way better battery life than Motorola RAMBLER. LG Shine CU720 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola RAMBLER, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG Shine CU720 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.