Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
3336.1
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
--0000-00-00
3.70 x 2.24 x 0.70 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
3.81 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 150.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.46.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
CDMACDMA
0.10.1
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
480 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
1.362.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

Samsung Chrono has a score of 36.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola RAMBLER's 33 score. Samsung Chrono's design is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola RAMBLER. Samsung Chrono features a more vivid display than Motorola RAMBLER, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixel amount per display inch and a better 320 x 240 resolution.

Samsung Chrono's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Motorola RAMBLER's one. The Samsung Chrono counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola RAMBLER, and although they both have a 0-Core CPU, the Samsung Chrono also has an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola RAMBLER counts with a much better camera than Samsung Chrono, because it has a way higher resolution back camera.

The Samsung Chrono features a way better battery duration than Motorola RAMBLER.

The Samsung Chrono not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.