Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is much better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a score of 83.3 against 75.2. The Apple iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola razr (2019) works with Android 10 operating system. Although Apple iPhone 11 and the Motorola razr (2019) were released only 5 months apart, the Apple iPhone 11 body is just a little bit lighter but thicker than the Motorola razr (2019).
The iPhone 11 features a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a little worse 828 x 1792px resolution, a little bit inferior pixels amount per inch in the screen and a little smaller screen. Motorola razr (2019) features much more memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The iPhone 11 counts with a better performing processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The iPhone 11 counts with greater battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3110mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 11 takes way better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution.
IPhone 11 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.