Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Motorola razr (2019), with a score of 85.3 against 75.2. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola razr (2019) comes with Android 10 operating system. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than Motorola razr (2019).
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a superior performance than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little bit bigger display, a better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Motorola razr (2019) features a very superior storage to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse (4K) video resolution, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos and a way less megapixels camera.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, iPhone 11 Pro Max is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.