Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 9.x |
| 2020-02-06 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s is better than Motorola razr (2019), getting an 83 score against 75.2. Although the Apple iPhone 6s is a lot older and a little bit thicker than Motorola razr (2019), it's body is still notably lighter. The Apple iPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x operating system, and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 6s counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. IPhone 6s features a much better display than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, a much smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 1334 x 750px.
The iPhone 6s shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse (4K) video resolution, a lot lower resolution back camera and a much tinier aperture. Apple iPhone 6s has as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Motorola razr (2019), both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola razr (2019) features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 6s, because it has 2510mAh of battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Apple iPhone 6s is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.