Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 overall score. Apple iPhone 8 Plus's body is just a little bit lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it is a little thicker and was released many years before. The iPhone 8 Plus has just a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 8 Plus features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot less megapixels resolution camera. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 2691mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Apple iPhone 8 Plus is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.