Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2019), with an 81.5 score against 75.2. The iPhone SE (2020) works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola razr (2019) counts with Android 10 operating system. The iPhone SE (2020) construction is incredibly lighter but a bit thicker than the Motorola razr (2019), and they were released only 3 months apart.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen, a lot smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334px. The Motorola razr (2019) counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2020), because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The iPhone SE (2020) features a quite better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has lesser RAM memory and 2 less processing cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone SE (2020) features a way better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a camera in the back with a way lower resolution and a lower video definition.
Motorola razr (2019) features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 38 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, iPhone SE (2020) is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.