Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than Motorola razr (2019), with a overall score of 88.1 against 75.2. The Apple iPhone X body is lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), but it's just a bit thicker and was released 2 years before. The iPhone X counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little greater screen pixels density.
IPhone X has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone X has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has an 8 percent greater battery capacity. Apple iPhone X captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lower (4K) video quality, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video and a back facing camera with a much lower resolution.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the iPhone X is also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.