Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), having an 82 score against 75.2. Apple iPhone XR's design is just a bit lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it's somewhat thicker and was released about a year before. The iPhone XR features a slightly better display than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a little bit smaller display, a little lower pixels density and a little bit worse resolution of 828 x 1792.
The Motorola razr (2019) features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone XR has a better performing processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XR has greater battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 2942mAh of battery capacity against 2510mAh. IPhone XR captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, a lower video quality and a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution.
Apple iPhone XR is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.