Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 general score. The iPhone XS is an older and just a little thicker cellphone than Motorola razr (2019), but Apple was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. Apple iPhone XS counts with a better performing processor than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a much better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a just a bit greater pixels density. The Motorola razr (2019) features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone XS has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 6% more battery size. The Apple iPhone XS features a much better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition, a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in low light situations and a back facing camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone XS not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.