Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), having an 80.2 score against 75.2. The Google Pixel body is way lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), but it's notably thicker and was released 3 years before. The Motorola razr (2019) features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel has a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display and a little bit higher 1080 x 1920px resolution. Google Pixel's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as Motorola razr (2019)'s one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 10% greater battery capacity. Google Pixel features a way better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in low light situations, a much less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Google Pixel not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.