Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), getting a general score of 82.5 against 75.2. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is somewhat lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a more vivid display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixels density.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a processor that's very similar to the CPU in Motorola razr (2019), and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Motorola razr (2019), they have equal internal storage.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a tinier aperture, a camera in the back with a way lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.