| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), having a general score of 80 against 75.2. Google Pixel 3's body is lighter than Motorola razr (2019), although it's somewhat thicker and was released a little bit over a year before. Google Pixel 3 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2160px resolution. Google Pixel 3 captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, a back camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower (4K) video definition.
The Motorola razr (2019) has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 2915mAh battery size against 2510mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.