Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019)'s global score of 75.2. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 3a is older and thicker than the Motorola razr (2019), it's construction is still lighter.
Motorola razr (2019) features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2019) also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2220 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing images in poorly lited situations. Motorola razr (2019) counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3a has greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2510mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3a is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.