Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s general score of 75.2. Google Pixel 3a XL is an older and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Motorola razr (2019), but Google managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
Motorola razr (2019) features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2019) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
The Motorola razr (2019) has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage. Google Pixel 3a XL has a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 47 percent greater battery size. Google Pixel 3a XL has a very superior camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a lower video quality, a way worse 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos.
The Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.