Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Motorola razr (2019), with an 81.9 score against 75.2. Even though Google Pixel 4 and the Motorola razr (2019) were released with only 4 months difference, the Google Pixel 4 body is thicker but also way lighter. The Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2280px resolution and a bit higher pixels density.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola razr (2019). They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Google Pixel 4 captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a back camera with a much lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 2800mAh battery size instead of 2510mAh.
Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.